beta
Text
1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;
2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, who published the “E-Local Newspapers” in 308, issued the “E-Local Newspapers” on an average of 6,400 copies once in year 201, the average of 12,900 copies once in year 2012, and the average of 10,000 copies once in year 2013, and distributed them to E-si.
1. On June 4, 2014, the Defendant issued an article (hereinafter “instant article 1”) unfavorable to H to the effect that, around May 3, 2014, at the 6th regional election of Dong-si (hereinafter “instant election”), around May 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around May 3, 201, at the foregoing office published the E-regional newspaper No. 146; and (b) around May 3, 2014, the Nonindicted Party (“F”); (c) had a criminal record of the E-market preliminary candidates affiliated with the G political party, such as the crime of false marriage, and the crime of violation of the National Security Act, but (d) was a candidate for local election E-market; and (d) H posted an article (hereinafter “instant article 20,000 copies”), published the article that is unfavorable to H to the effect that he gifted accompanied by a female employee working in the I’s election office and Jeju-do.
As a result, the defendant distributed and spread a newspaper that posted an article about the election in a way other than a normal way.
2. In relation to the instant election, around June 2, 2014, the Defendant published the E-Local Newspapers No. 147 at the above office, and published 20,000 copies of the article disadvantageous to L, a candidate for the E market belonging to the Mparty, to the purport that, under the title “J and K,” a public official of E in the first page “J” was involved in the case where a public opinion poll was conducted by using the representative of a local newspaper and that there was a suspicion that the current E market engaged in the case where the public opinion poll was conducted by using the representative of a local newspaper, and that the police investigation was anticipated to be conducted accordingly, and distributed them to the apartment complex, commercial building, housing, etc. located in the E market belonging to the Mparty.
Accordingly, the defendant's newspaper carrying articles about the election is a way other than ordinary method.