logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.02.22 2015고단902
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records” On October 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court, which became final and conclusive on February 12, 2016.

【Criminal facts constituting a crime】 A around January 2014, the Defendant came to know of the victim D through C, and the Defendant tried to provide the victim with a loan to take over theme park.

When the certificate of balance of KRW 1 billion is proved, the investment trust extended the amount of KRW 10 billion as the acquisition fund, and the amount of KRW 3 billion is first paid in advance from the investment trust. Thus, the victim would be able to repay C's debt of KRW 150 million to the amount of KRW 100 million. The victim would bear the burden of proof of balance between the defendant and each 500 million with the defective defendant, as it is possible to prove balance of KRW 500 million, and the victim would prove balance of KRW 500 million.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not keep the certificate of balance for KRW 500 million that the defendant decided to take charge of, and requested the defendant to leave the passbook with KRW 500 million deposited by the victim to the defendant, and the victim refused the proposal of the defendant and recovered KRW 500 million.

On February 2014, the Defendant, from around 2014, came to know of the location where the victim can borrow KRW 1 billion with the bonds.

The principal and interest of C's debt amounting to KRW 150,000,000 in the face of KRW 30,000,000 shall be paid to C as the principal and interest of C's debt amounting to KRW 150,000,000.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the facts are that the defendant was unaware of the bond company and the defendant was able to make a loan using the guarantee insurance.

No. 50

From November 2013, E, etc., it is known that it was impossible to provide a loan because the promise was not implemented.

arrow