logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.08.14 2018구합62553
교습비조정명령취소
Text

1. The order of adjustment of each tuition fee issued by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs on February 1, 2018 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiffs registered the establishment and operation of a private teaching institute with respect to each reading room located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City as shown below, and have been operated until now.

(C) On July 2, 2014, the Plaintiff’s name was registered as the reading room (hereinafter “each of the instant reading rooms”) and the Plaintiff’s name was registered as the reading room (hereinafter “each of the instant reading rooms”). On July 2, 2015, the Plaintiff’s name was registered as the reading room (hereinafter “each of the instant reading rooms”).

The Defendant determined the standard amount of tuition fees for each reading room in his/her jurisdiction as KRW 144,00 (hereinafter referred to as “previous standard amount”). On February 2017, the Plaintiffs refer to the tuition fees where the students increase the tuition fees for each reading room of this case in excess of the previous standard amount as stated in the attached Table 1 “reported tuition fees” to the Defendant.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

An application for change was filed.

(Application for the registration of modification of the above tuition fees (hereinafter referred to as the "application of this case"), and the report tuition fees (hereinafter referred to as the "report tuition fees") for which the plaintiffs applied for the registration of modification.

After deliberation by the Mediation Committee, the Defendant issued an order to adjust tuition fees to the Plaintiffs on February 1, 2018, pursuant to attached Table 1, pursuant to Article 15(6) of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Private Teaching Institutes and Extracurricular Lessons (hereinafter “Private Teaching Institutes Act”) and Article 17-2(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the former Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Establishment and Operation of Private Teaching Institutes and Extracurricular Lessons (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29370, Dec. 18, 2018; hereinafter “former Enforcement Decree of the Private Teaching Institutes Act”) on the grounds that the amount of tuition fees reported by the Plaintiffs is excessive compared to the previous standard amount, the appropriateness and transparency of the accounting documents submitted by the Plaintiffs is unclear.

arrow