1. 피고들은 원고에게 남양주시 H 답 1,478㎡ 중 별지도면 표시 ⓐⓐ, ⓑ, ⓒ, ⓓ, ⓐ의 각 점을...

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) On December 12, 1991, the Plaintiff: (a) from his father of the Plaintiff on December 12, 1991, the Plaintiff is deemed to be the Plaintiff’s land of this case 1,478 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

)를 증여받고, 1991. 12. 16. 소유권이전등기를 마쳤다. 2) O는 1992년경 원고로부터 이 사건 토지를 임차하여 그 지상에 별지 도면 표시 ⓐ, ⓑ, ⓒ, ⓓ, ⓐ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 I동 비닐하우스 34㎡를, ⓔ, ⓕ, ⓖ, ⓗ, ⓔ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 J동 비닐하우스 150㎡를, ⓘ, ⓙ, ⓚ, ⓛ, ⓘ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 K동 샌드위치판넬조 건물 60㎡를, ⓜ, ⓝ, ⓞ, ⓟ, ⓜ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 L동 비닐하우스 264㎡를, ⓠ, ⓡ, ⓢ, ⓣ, ⓠ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 M동 비닐하우스 264㎡를, ⓤ, ⓥ, ⓦ, ⓧ, ⓤ의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 N동 비닐하우스 192㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 각 비닐하우스’라고 한다)를 각 설치하였다.

3) Around 2001, Defendant B leased each of the instant vinyls from O, and partially subleted them to Defendant C, D, E, F, and G, and the Defendants jointly possess each of the instant vinyls. 4) In the instant litigation procedure, the decision of recommending reconciliation was finalized with the purport that “O removes each of the instant vinyls and delivers each of the respective sites.”

[Ground] Defendant B and E: Confession deemed as confession (Article 208(3)2 and the main text of Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendants, by occupying each of the instant plastic houses, interfere with the Plaintiff’s exercise of ownership over the instant land, are obligated to leave each of the instant plastic houses.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified.