The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 2015, the Defendant was aware that the victim B (here, 32 years of age) who was aboard a taxi as a guest was able to enter the mother facility along with the infant, and was living together until June 2015 with the Defendant’s house.

1. On July 28, 2015, around 16:50, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim who was living together in the house of the Defendant of Heungdong-gu Seoul apartment 123 Dong-dong 504, the Defendant, who had been living separately at the house of the Defendant, with the Defendant’s view that “the victim of the defect of the bath theory, i.e., e., e., e., h., h., h., h. to h. to h. to h.h. to h. to h.h. to h. to h.h. to h. to h.h. to h.

2. The Defendant, around October 8, 2015, at around 15:00, did not lend money to the victim’s house by stating that “the victim, who was living together with the Plaintiff at the same place as the Plaintiff, “I am at the bar to lend the living expenses” to the Defendant’s house.

was made.

Therefore, on the ground that the victim expressed his/her desire, he/she tried to take the face of the victim several times, and assaulted the victim by walking the baby several times.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Expression of intention not to punish: A written agreement submitted on December 18, 2015, which was after the institution of public prosecution of this case.

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;