A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2018, the Defendant was under influence on “D” cafeteria located at the Government-Si of Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do on July 17:10, 2018.

피고 인은 위 식당 업주의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 의정부 경찰서 E 지구대 소속 경위 F(49 세), 경장 G(30 세) 이 자신을 흔들어 깨우며 귀가할 것을 종용하자 갑자기 위 경찰관들에게 “ 뭘 꼴아 봐 씨 발 놈아, 개새끼야 죽여 버린다.

“Ching the floor” and booming the breath of the F with hand over the floor by pushing the breath, and cutting the said G over the floor by sticking the drinking with hand and cutting it over the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning F and G reporting processing duties, which are public officials of the police, as seen above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court] The aggravated area (one year to four years in the case of multiple damaged public officials, one year to four years in the case of multiple damaged public officials) of the first type of crime obstructing the performance of official duties (the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court] (the scope of punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Social Service Order] [the defendant has a history of criminal punishment on several occasions

The crime of interference with the performance of official duties is a crime that is not good quality in that it makes it difficult to exercise the appropriate exercise of the public authority, which is the basis of the rule of law, and that the damage is returned to a good majority of citizens.

In light of the form of the instant crime and the degree of the type of the instant crime, the case may be deemed to be light.

It is a serious crime that cannot be said to be an inevitable crime.

However, it shall be considered in favor of the defendant who recognized the crime and divided his mistake.

. The above.