A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CKaman vehicle.

On April 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven the above vehicle at around 01:50, and changed the rapid lane to one lane while driving the front road of the “E cafeteria” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu D from the Sgsan Sgular road to the Sgsan-dong Sgyeong-dong private road.

At that time, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle with a string and a new wall time shall observe accurately the front section and direction of the vehicle, and when it is likely to obstruct the normal operation of another vehicle running in the direction of the change when changing course, he/she shall not change course, and in advance, he/she has a duty of care to operate a direction direction, etc. in order to give prior notice of change of course and to prevent accidents by changing the vehicle's way in a safe manner by safely changing the vehicle's way.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate his vehicle by negligence and was in the same direction as the victim F (46 tax) who was driving in the same direction as that of the victim F (46 tax) by negligence, and received the top door part of the Ghive-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed vehicle.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, tried to escape without immediately stopping a vehicle and providing relief to the victim H (the 29 years old) and the victim I (the 30 years old), respectively, even though the victim H (the 29 years old) and the victim I (the 30 years old), who took advantage of the said vehicle with approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant did not take measures such as providing relief to the victim F by immediately stopping the vehicle even though the 1,737,041 won was damaged to ensure that the 1,737,041 won was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F, H and I;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Specific crimes provided for in the corresponding provisions of the Act regarding criminal facts.