The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Around January 31, 2012, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case as to the non-prosecution of the Defendant: (a) around January 31, 2012, at the N attorney-at-law office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the complainant is the Defendant; (b) the Defendant is the Defendant, and the Defendant is the Defendant at the above attorney’s office around March 5, 2012; and (c) the Defendant is the Defendant with a false additional statement of the content that the Defendant is F, Q and P, respectively.

The details of the above complaint and additional complaint are the subcontractors who have entered into a subcontract with R Co., Ltd., a primary contractor for the construction site of G University and I hotel construction work. F is the field manager for the construction site of the above case, Q is the site manager for the construction site of the above dormitory, the construction site manager for Q is the above hotel construction site, the representative director of the S Co., Ltd., and FF andO are the representative director of the P Co., Ltd. on November 18, 201. ① on November 18, 2011, F andO arbitrarily brought 8.5 million won of construction materials loaded at the dormitory site of the above HG University to the V Housing site of Gyeonggi-do. ② From November 10, 2011 to November 26, 2011, F,O and P conspired conspired with them to bring them to the above 101,126,736, at will, at the same time, at the same time, at the construction site of the above H college to 208.24.

However, the fact is that R(State) has entered into a subcontract with the 5 primary hotel construction works, such as I hotel construction works, under the name of F, and instead of performing the construction works, the construction works are for the said G new construction works and the dormitory expansion works for G college universities in return for lending the name of B(State).