(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.11 2015고단1928

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.06.11 2015고단1928

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 22, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Interference with business;

A. On April 9, 2015, at around 20:30 on April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to the victim refusing the victim’s “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (nive, 42 years of age) located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City; (b) stated that the victim refused the victim’s demand to provide bread, “a two-years, Chewing, and her inside and outside Korea have gone back”; (c) forced the victim to buy the hydrogen, and (d) demanded cash 10,000 won, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

B. On April 9, 2015, around 21:15, the Defendant: (a) provided a bath to the victim who refuses the demand of the victim G (n, 49 years of age) located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City “H”; (b) provided a bath to the victim who refuses the demand of bread; and (c) provided a living cream resort located in the display belt as his/her hand, thereby obstructing the victim’s smooth operation by force.

2. On April 9, 2015, the Defendant was demanded from the victim to change the “K” restaurant operated by the Victim J (Inn, 52 years of age) located in the Nam-gu Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon. However, the Defendant was demanded from the victim to change the water and Kimb. However, the Defendant was demanded from the victim to “the end of the business.”

However, the defendant, under the influence of alcohol, did not respond to it, repeats the above demands made by the victim and repeats such demands. The defendant, without justifiable reasons, leaves the victim until the victim flees by side.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

3. The Defendant of larceny No. 1 B.

At the time, at the place, the victim G was placed in the display stand, where the victim G avoided the above act of the defendant and moved to another place, and was stolen by putting three bread, such as living cream and booming, etc. in the market value equivalent to KRW 12,000, which was owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1...

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2021.04.07 2020고단1327

-울산지방법원 2015.09.22 2015고정739

-청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.11.10 2016고단225

-울산지방법원 2016.09.02 2016고단1094

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.07.23 2013고단1535