1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition stated in the purport of the claim (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

A. On September 6, 2013, E Company E (hereinafter “E”) filed an application for rating of “B” game products (hereinafter “instant game products”) under the name of “B” with the Game Rating Board [the former Game Industry Promotion Act was amended by Act No. 11785, May 22, 2013 (Articles 16 and 16-2). The Game Rating Board was deemed abolished. Defendant (Game Game Management Committee) succeeded to all rights, duties, and property of the Game Rating Board, and the previous rating classification received by the Game Rating Board was considered to be the rating received by Defendant (Game Game Industry Management Committee) (Article 4 of the Addenda). The file of the instant game products was submitted.

E When applying for a rating, it indicated that “the instant game product does not have any element related to “scambling” and “scambling” in the instant case, and then partly revised the phrase in order to help the understanding of the purport stated in the text of the text box, and it was underlined in the part in need of emphasizing.

It is the same in all cases as the content of the documentary evidence without mentioning otherwise in the judgment below.

The same game explanation was submitted.

(No. 2, No. 1-2, No. 4-1, No. 26). 1. Game summary obstacle games

In line with the string, it is necessary to divide the string and make it difficult to do so.

2. The game is a game which obtains points in excess of obstacles at the end of one's own choice and gives one another in the game;

5. The selection of a game display shall indicate a word in preparation for the departure line;

After the start, it is necessary to keep the string in line with the string, thereby spreading the obstacles to the end of the damage.

50 points shall be given each time exceeding the obstacle, and the game price shall be.