logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.03.05 2018고정637
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was in the C office of the first floor located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 2018, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim D (the 55 years old), who resides in the upper floor, and the drain of the office. During the dispute, the Defendant was in the middle of the 3 to 4 times bomb, thereby provokinging down the victim’s chest part, and was in the middle of the 3 to 4 times bomb, and the victim was in the middle of the 14-day bomb, and was in the middle of the 21-day sexual stress reaction, etc., which requires treatment.

2. As to the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant and the defense counsel denied that the victim’s body was exceptionally contacted with the victim’s body by hand, who did not have an office from the investigative agency to this court, and that the victim did not have any flaps or flab, thereby causing injury to the victim.

According to the records of this case, the following facts are recognized.

On May 1, 2018, the defendant delivered the purport that the victim who uses the second and third floors of the same building was at issue in the sewage of the defendant's office back to the above building on May 16, 2018. On the other hand, the victim entered the office of the defendant's husband and her husband and her husband and confirmed the situation of the defendant's oral statement by entering the office of the defendant's third father and her husband.

Third, the victim went back to the second floor after his father and her mother were returned to the second floor, and the defendant's children E and the second floor was confirmed that there was no reason to cause sewage problem to the defendant's office in the residence of the victim.

The victim does not hear the statements of the victim concerning sewage treatment at all with the victim's right to speak with E and the victim's third father, who arrived at around E and the victim's first floor office, and with fraud.

arrow