logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.01.09 2019고단5196
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2019, at around 21:10 on September 28, 2019, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at the C festival site in Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, he saw the victim’s left right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right right

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties on auxiliary police officers' security assistance and at the same time injured the victim who is an auxiliary police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each investigation report (Attachment of standing photographs), the application of statutes (Attachment of a medical certificate);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant, under the influence of alcohol, interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties while driving a bridge of an auxiliary police officer in the course of performing his duties.

However, the sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, home environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, are equally considered and the sentence is determined as ordered.

arrow