1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are siblings, and the Defendant and the selected C (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) are marital relationships.

B. Chungcheongnam-do planned to develop H as a marine leisure and tourism resort site in around 2000, and it sold the K forest in Chungcheongnam-do at the price of KRW 120,000 from KRW 10,000 to KRW 120,000 per square.

C. When the Defendant solicits the Plaintiff to make an investment in the above land, the Plaintiff paid 54 million won to the Call on April 4, 200, and sold 540 square meters out of the above land in the Plaintiff’s name under the Plaintiff’s Arabic name. The Defendant also paid 80 million won to the Call on the same day, and received 800 square meters out of the above land.

However, it is difficult for the plaintiff and the defendant to acquire the ownership of the above land because the anti-do Credit Union applied for a voluntary auction on the above land.

E. On March 1, 2002, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant, etc. to purchase each of the instant land and each of the instant land and Cheongju-si I and J land in the amount of KRW 54 million (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

F. On March 1, 2002, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between the Defendant, etc. with the land of this case and the land of Cheongju-si, equivalent to the Cheongju-si, from March 1, 2002 to February 29, 2012, with the term of lease from March 1, 2002 to February 29, 201, and with the rent annual 80 km (hereinafter “the first lease agreement of this case”), and cultivated and used the said land as farmland.

G. Upon the termination of the first lease agreement of this case, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, etc. concluded a new lease agreement with the term of ten years extended from March 1, 2012 to February 29, 202 under the same condition (hereinafter “the second lease agreement of this case”).

H. The Plaintiff leased and cultivated each of the instant land from the Defendant, etc. to the farmland ledger.