logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고정416
건강기능식품에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an overseas Korean of Chinese nationality.

1. No person who violates the Health Functional Foods Act in connection with false or exaggerated advertisements shall indicate or advertise that health functional foods have efficacy or effect in the prevention and treatment of diseases, or that they may confuse themselves as medicine, with regard to the name, raw materials, manufacturing methods, nutrients, ingredients, methods of use, quality, and tracking and management of records of health functional foods;

Nevertheless, the defendant from February 1, 2015 to the same year.

5. By December 23, 200, in order to sell the Nam-gu Incheon apartment D apartment or the "E", which is a health functional food, from the Internet shopping mall (F and G), the Internet shopping mall (F and G) is awarded one of the Korean national news, and the body is health only where it is a simple health.

E shall be adequate for local, alcohol content damage, inter-biberization, and alcohol harmful.

The phrase “E” posted the phrase “the health functional food,” and advertised “E” as if it had efficacy and effect in preventing and treating diseases.

2. Any person who intends to sell business of selling health functional foods in violation of the Health Functional Foods Act related to not reporting shall install facilities for each place of business, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Prime Minister, and report to the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, the Special Self-Governing Province branch office, or the head of Si

Nevertheless, Defendant 1 sold Dohap 144,934 (Korean won: 26,58,383 won) over a total of 15 times against many and unspecified persons, and Defendant 1 did not report the sale of health functional foods to the head of Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, the reporting authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to I and each written statement of I;

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. (F) On the Internet (F), a notice board, a photo of a door-to-door dispatch, a certificate of report on the sale of functional health foods (I), a certified copy of the corporate registry (E), and a list of search of food and drug prototypes;

arrow