logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.19 2015고정2760
의료법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an employee J and K employed as an unqualified massage in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building, and operated an illegal massage place against customers.

No person shall engage in massage and massage business for profit without obtaining recognition of qualification as a massager from the Mayor/Do Governor.

Nevertheless, at around 15:00 on June 2, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with J and K, received 30,000 won from each customer who could not know his name, and had K and K know the same. The Defendant, in collusion with the said K and K, had his employees J and K know the same, who are disqualified massagemen; J and K, used the fingers, handouts, handouts and handouts of the customer, caused the customer to fright up and fright up the frighted fright and frighted frighted frighten, thereby having the customer know the frighted fright and frighted frighted frighted fright, thereby having the customer know the fright

In this way, the Defendant conspired with J and K to engage in massage activities for profit without qualification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against K and J;

1. Each written statement of L or M;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Article 88 and Article 82 (1) of the Medical Service Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant was tried to commit the same kind of crime at the same place and was committed on June 10, 2015. In addition, in the situation where the sentence is being pronounced on June 10, 2015, the crime of this case was committed. Considering the character and behavior improvement intent of the defendant and the fact that it seems that there is considerable lack

arrow