A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from March 31, 2006 to August 28, 2012, worked as the representative director of the victim E company located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who was in charge of the business of the said company, is a person who actually runs the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) from October 17, 201.

1. Around November 4, 2011, the Defendant: (a) carried the Victim Company’s products, G 9, and H 14, which were the products of the Victim Company; (b) carried them out to a warehouse managed by F in E in E in terms of harmony; and (c) embezzled by voluntarily disposing of them in the name of Samsung SDR Co., Ltd. from January 9, 201 to March 201 under F’s name.

2. Around January 2012, the Defendant, in relation to occupational embezzlement of ruptures, has been in custody at the victim company for business purposes with three ruptures (J) and three ruptures (K), which are products produced by the victim company, and then arbitrarily carried them out to the F plant in the rupture L, and embezzled it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness M and N;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Written statement by prosecution;

1. Part of the statement made by the police twice in the interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement of M;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements by an O excursion ship of a witness);

1. A copy of the delivery details and tender notice, a partial certificate of each registered matter, a product description, minutes of November 4, 201, a tax invoice, a fact-finding certificate, a confirmation document, an order and a contract statement, G stolens, G stolens, H stolens, Plostings, P Interlater Order, P manufacturing, delivery order form, and the purchase and sale order form in 2012 [the defendant and his defense counsel] of the goods under paragraph (1) of the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court, namely, G9, H 14 U.S. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “TPS”).

I asserts to the effect that ownership is owned.

However, each evidence in the holding.