logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2018.10.25 2018가합10124
어촌계분할에관한동의 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B fishing village fraternity was established according to the division resolution by the general meeting of the fishing village fraternity on May 29, 1990. Defendant B fishing village fraternity was divided into H fishing village fraternity and Defendant B fishing village fraternity on May 29, 1990. Defendant B fishing village fraternity consists of 75 residents residing in the first large-scale B village in Sa city, and J D village (D village consists of A, E, and F).

(B) The Defendant B was composed of 24 residents, and the shape of the village B and D are as shown in Appendix 3.2) The Defendant B’s fishing village fraternity covers the I branch line and the K branch line.

B. Defendant B fishing village fraternity: (a) the occurrence of disputes within Defendant B fishing village fraternity and the application for authorization of division of a fishing village fraternity by residents of D village; and (b) Defendant B fishing village fraternity is the L Cooperatives around March 200 (hereinafter “L Cooperatives”).

(2) On August 7, 2001, a part of the residents of D village, including N, were holding an inaugural general meeting for the establishment of a fishing village fraternity on May 19, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”), and on August 7, 2001, some of the residents of D village, including N, were subject to internal conflicts due to the selection of the marine aquaculture complex development project site implemented by this, and as a result, a resolution was passed to remove M, N,O, P, and Q, who are residents of D village who oppose the selection of the said project site. Accordingly, some of the residents of D village, including N, retired from the Defendant B fishing village fraternity.

However, the above divided fishing village fraternity was rejected at the general meeting of Defendant B's fishing village fraternity.

3. On October 12, 2001 and April 6, 2002, some of the residents of the 3D village filed a request with the macro-Do Mayor for the division of Defendant B fishing village fraternities into a fishing village fraternity comprised of the Plaintiff and the residents of the B village, but it was subject to the disposition of refusal on March 4, 2003.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the above rejection disposition with the Changwon District Court 2003Guhap1163.

arrow