logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단1430
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a leisure car.

On April 1, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at a speed of 1:35, and proceeded four-lanes of the four-lanes to the intersection of the Young-gu common distance, which is in the regular course of the Gwangju Mine District, from the ordinary course of the business area to the south of the city at a speed of non-speed.

At this point, the signal lights and crosswalks are installed, and the passage of people is frequent, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely in accordance with the signals by making the front door well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and took part of the body part on the left side of the victim D (the 34 years old) who walked along the crosswalk from the right side of the road in the direction of the course of the course by neglecting the yellow yellow signal at the same speed, and took part on the right side of the above vehicle, and suffered approximately four weeks of treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Reports (1), (2) on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the victim’s injury is not less severe, and that the defendant violated the signal, and that the defendant injured the victim walking on the crosswalk, and that the defendant was grossly negligent, is disadvantageous.

On the other hand, it is advantageous to the fact that the defendant was exposed to the victim while bypassing at a low speed, that the vehicle of the defendant can be considerably recovered from the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and that the defendant has no criminal power for the same kind of crime.

The age, character, character and environment of the defendant in this normal relation;

arrow