logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.02.22 2017고단3138
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and by imprisonment for six months; and

2. However, as to the Defendants, this case is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 high group 3138] (Defendant A) No person may transfer any electronic financial transaction access medium.

Nevertheless, on March 8, 2017, the Defendant transferred 6 million won (3 million won per account) of the Defendant’s name bank account in the name of the Defendant, including (E) and (F) a national bank account in the name of the Defendant, on the condition that he/she received six million won (3 million won per account) in front of the D restaurant located in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si (Seoul), and transferred the electronic financial transaction access media through Kwikset’s service.

[2018 Goman 103 [Defendant 103] (hereinafter “Defendant”) from July 2017 to July 1, 2017, the Defendants posted a false letter of sale on the Internet goods transaction site, such as “openter,” and conspired to receive money from the people visiting and obtain money in the name of the price of goods.

On September 5, 2017, the Defendants posted a false letter of sale on the said website at the site of the said site, and reported the false letter to the victim G who contacted with the Defendants. The Defendants sent the article to the victim G, who first deposited KRW 500,000,000 in advance.

Although the Defendants made a false statement, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to sell the goods promised to the victim even if they received money from the injured party.

The Defendants deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 500,000 from the new bank account (I) in the H’s name as the price for goods at around 07:46 on the same day from the victim, and received KRW 2,100,000 from around that time to September 6, 2017 by deceiving the total of four victims by the same method, such as the statement in the list of crimes from around the day to September 6, 2017.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce victims to receive goods.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 3138]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. A statement of petition and details of each account transaction [2018 high group 103].

arrow