(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단8089

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단8089

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi vehicle.

around 13:36 August 30, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, while driving the vehicle on the front road along the two-lanes between the six-lanes, the Defendant proceeded from the southwest intersection of the Dong-dong, to the northwest of the Cheongdo-dong Intersection.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by taking into account the traffic conditions on the front side and the left side according to the name of the person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and brought about the left side of the victim F (45 ) driving G Hatoba, driving on the right side of the above vehicle on the crosswalk at the crosswalk where he is placed, due to an occupational negligence in contravention of the electric-side red signal, and brought about the front side of the above vehicle.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the opening of the aggregate of the expenses required for treatment of about 14 weeks on the left-hand side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. On-site photographs, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of selective fines (such as the fact that only the victim has agreed with the victim, the fact that the victim is admitted to the Financial Cooperative, the fact that the victim has no previous record of the same kind, and the fault of the victim has a significant impact on the occurrence of this case

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.30 2018고단3461

-서울동부지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고단527

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.07 2017고단7281

-서울동부지방법원 2018.01.16 2017고단3597

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고정543