logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.06.02 2015고단703
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a C-A-Wurt Motor Vehicle.

On January 25, 2015, at around 19:57, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.133%, and led to the bypassing the route of the string distance of the smoke in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government large-dong from the non-wide area to the bank of the Eunpyeong Police Station.

Since there is a road where a central line has been installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by complying with the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected it, and neglected to breath while bypassing the center line, and took part of the part above the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle following the driving of the victim D(E 53 years old, south, and 53 years old) who stopped in the traffic signal atmosphere in the opposite direction.

The upper part of the victim G (Nam, 53 years old) driving, which was stopped in the opposite direction in the Fawon direction without taking necessary measures to raise the above accident, was shocked into the front part of the Defendant’s left side and even door.

The part of the left-hand side of the victim J (Nam, 33 years old) driving of the victim J (J), which continued to flee without any measure, was in contact with the Defendant's next right-hand side, and then the signal signs in front of the non-luminous area should be shocked and stopped as the front part.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence as above, suffered from the victim L (Nam, 61 years of age) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle at approximately two weeks of injury, such as an open wound, etc. In addition, the Defendant suffered from the victim G, who is a rocketing taxi driver, about two weeks of injury, such as cryp salt, which requires approximately two-day medical treatment, and the injury of light cryp salt, etc., which requires approximately two-day medical treatment to the victimJ, who is a arche driver, and the said hump car.

arrow