(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.11.09 2015고단1877

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.11.09 2015고단1877

업무상횡령

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2010, the Defendant has been employed by the Victim B, a business employee, as a business employee, for the supply of foodstuffs, etc., and has been engaged in food sale and collection business.

On September 1, 2010, the Defendant collected KRW 100,000 from the price of goods supplied by the victim company in Pyeongtaek-si C and used the goods for the victim company. Around that time, the Defendant used the goods for personal purposes, such as living expenses, at his/her own discretion.

From around that time to October 30, 2010, the Defendant spent the total of KRW 11,255,890, in mind, the sum of the food prices stored in the business for the said company, which was collected from Pyeongtaek-si, etc. by the same means 20 times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

As a result, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim who was in custody on duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation and transaction account books;

1. Where there is no special sponser from among the types 1 to 356(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the pertinent provision of the criminal facts and the reasons for sentencing (determination of the application of the sentencing criteria) under Articles 356 and 355(1) of the Criminal Act (determination of the sentencing criteria): The scope of the recommended sentence: The decision of the suspended sentence shall be made on the grounds that the circumstances as seen earlier and the motive and background leading up to the crime, the circumstances leading up to the crime, criminal records, the age of the accused, character and conduct, intelligence, environment, etc. are not considered, and the decision of the ordered sentence shall be made on the grounds that the above circumstances and the motive and background leading up to the crime, the circumstances leading to the crime, the criminal records, the age

참조조문

-형법 제355조 제1항

-형법 제356조

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2019.04.26 2019고단178

-서울동부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014고단3372

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.11.13 2015고단1316

-부산지방법원 2014.09.04 2014고단3615

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.01.29 2014고단2120