logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.31 2015고합226
강간
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) completed the work with the victim shedba (the victim she was 24 years of age; hereinafter the same shall apply) who was working at the Gindo house on April 17, 2015; and (b) took part in the “D” restaurant located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, by taking part in drinking at the “D” restaurant; and (c) was unable to properly divide the body of the victim after drinking the victim; and (d) was under the influence of alcohol with “Fururel” 307 located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, 05:47, the Defendant: (a) led the victim who was deprived of his mind; (b) took off the part of the victim’s upper body; and (c) expressed the victim’s intention to refuse to do so; and (d) was off from the victim’s lower body; and (d) made the victim’s she was unable to have sexual intercourse with the police after having reported the victim’s sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Any statement made by the defendant in compliance with this Act;

1. A statement made by the prosecutor to the extent that the statement of witness prepared by the public prosecutor is appropriate;

1. The statement prepared by the Gwangju Science Investigation Institute of Korea in conformity with the results of genetic testing;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes that conforms to the results of the video recordings of the main office, the tele-recording of the tele-teleccom, and the printed output of the victim mobile phone text messages;

1. Article 297 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing shall be considered);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act cannot be deemed to pose a risk of re-offending because the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime, and it is difficult to see that the defendant lives together with his/her parents and two female students while attending a university

1. The punishment, etc. of sexual assault crimes;

arrow