logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.08 2017가단515102
임대차보증금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 7,290,00 and 5% per annum from April 6, 2018 to August 8, 2018, and the next day.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the lessee who entered into a commercial lease contract with the Defendant for D Ka P PP in Gwangju-dong, the Defendant owned, and the Defendant is the lessor as the owner of the instant Ka P PP.

B. On February 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) as a broker of E, the F team leader, who is an employee of the Defendant Company; (b) decided to lease a deposit for the said car page with F and verbal, KRW 20 million; (c) KRW 1 million for monthly rent; (d) KRW 300,000 for management expenses; and (e) value-added tax to KRW 130,000 for additional taxes.

C. The Plaintiff’s team leader for the same year

3. 11. Receiving the keys to the above DKapet;

3. 14. Deposit 20 million won was remitted to the Defendant’s passbook.

The plaintiff, around that time, performed the installation of the inside Ka Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa P

4. From the first police officer, the Kafin was operated.

The plaintiff and defendant for the same year

4. A commercial lease agreement stating deposit amounting to patrolmen: KRW 20 million; KRW 700,000 for monthly rent; KRW 400,000 for management expenses (as requested by the plaintiff, monthly rent and management expenses are adjusted); the term of lease is from March 14, 2017 to March 14, 2018 (the date of preparation shall be March 28, 2017; hereinafter the same shall apply).

E. The Plaintiff, while running his business in the instant car page, ordered the Defendant to order the instant car page.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant revoked the instant lease agreement (A) concluded that, while leasing the instant carpet building to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, as the lessee, did not interfere with the Plaintiff’s business registration and operation.

After receiving a contract from the defendant, the plaintiff was issued a building management ledger and a certified copy of the register to apply for a business license to the Dong-gu Office of Gwangju, and the above D Kafin building is an unauthorized building, as business registration is asked at the tax office.

arrow