Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2017, at the 'E' restaurant of D operation in Sinposi, Sinposi, around 23:10 on August 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) filed a dispute with D, the owner of a vessel that she gets into his/her hands, and reported 112; (b) sent the police box to the site and identified the details of the report; (c) provided that the police officer, at the police station of Sinpo Police Station, who belongs to the police station of Sinpo-si, called Hapo-si, called Hapo-si, assigned the police officer to check the personal information of the Defendant, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of the instant report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the statutes governing witness H’s legal statement;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not correspond to the nature of a crime in light of the background and content of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., there is no record of punishment for interference with the performance of official duties, and there is no record of punishment for interference with the performance of official duties, and multiple sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, sex, occupation, family relationship, property status, etc. are taken into account.