logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.08.11 2010가합47174
예금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,176,671,952 among the Plaintiff and KRW 7,620,383,926 among the Plaintiff, from November 5, 2009 to May 19, 2010.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 4, 2009, 1D 1D 200,000 7.3% per annum 4, 2000,000 (hereinafter “D Account”) and 3F 〃 3,620,383,926 〃 3,620,926 (hereinafter “F Account”) was the Plaintiff’s warranty bond system under construction is a system that the owner or contractor deposits the warranty bond at a financial institution to guarantee the owner’s or contractor’s liability for defect repair. In fact, the Plaintiff was unable to receive the Plaintiff’s credit on May 11, 2001, and the Plaintiff was issued the warranty bond in the form of a financial institution and was issued the warranty bond at the financial institution.

Therefore, as above, the security deposit for repairing defects that the construction mutual aid association has the authority as a pledgee falls under the so-called "unusedd money, the collection of which is restricted by a special contract," and ② The construction mutual aid association must obtain the consent of cancellation of the pledge.

On November 4, 2008, in order to issue a guarantee certificate from the Construction Mutual Aid Association, the following three term deposits (hereinafter “instant term deposit contract”) were entered into with the Defendant (the competent branch: C branch) and deposited the total amount of KRW 7,620,383,926 (hereinafter “instant deposit”).

B. At the time of entering into the instant term deposit contract with G and H, G with the director in charge of the Plaintiff’s re-satisfy team at the time of entering into the instant term deposit contract with G and H, the Defendant and the vice-director in the Defendant C branch and H.

arrow