The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case in spite of the fact that the defendant did not assault the victim F and inflicted an injury, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly admitted and adopted by the court below, i.e., ① the victim of the crime of this case clearly states that the victim of the crime of this case met with the defendant at the time when he was investigated by the investigative agency, ② the victim's statement is relatively detailed and detailed, such as the part of the victim who was assaulted by the defendant, the frequency of the assault, and the circumstances at the time of the assault, etc., ② the credibility of the statement is high, ③ the victim was investigated by the police after about one hour from the defendant when he was her, ③ the victim was investigated by the police after about one hour from the time when he was her, and the judicial police assistant E, who was investigated by the victim, was not in any situation where the victim was unable to act or communicate with the victim when her was under the influence of alcohol. Thus, the victim's statement was made, the situation before and after the crime

It does not seem that there are any particular circumstances to suspect the victim's statement, such as the victim's statement of a fact that he or she was unable to memory properly due to alcohol. ④ The victim's statement at an investigative agency to the effect that he or she met her left her with her with her face-to-face her face her face-to-face her face her face-to-face her face, but it is difficult to say that her face-to-face her face her face-to-face her face face her face-to-face her face her face face-to-face her face face her face-to-face her face her face

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.