beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) at the Daejeon District Court on January 21, 201, and two years of suspension of execution was finalized on January 29, 2015.
1. Around March 25, 2011, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C to the effect that “Around March 25, 2011, the Defendant would allow the victim C to sell the F apartment complex commercial building located in the area for a housing site development in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is well known to the Chairperson E, by means of a private contract at KRW 2.9 billion. In order to do so, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that entertainment expenses, such as the value of rice liquor, the meal expenses
However, in fact, since the above commercial building is decided to be sold in public competitive bidding, not a private contract, from the beginning, by D Co., Ltd., the contractor, and even if receiving money from the victim as entertainment expenses related to the above commercial building, there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to purchase the above commercial
Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5 million from the victim on April 20, 201, around April 24, 2011, KRW 3 million on or around April 24, 201, and KRW 18 million on or around April 29, 201, from the Agricultural Cooperative under the name of the Defendant.
2. Around August 8, 2013, the Defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the effect that “The victim G is well aware of the D Company E president and I regular business and has been employed in the same way as a model for several years,” at the coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H. M. D companies trying to build a 900-household apartment house of Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do, and try to build an apartment house 2,00 households near the Ansan ICT and in order to build an apartment house 2,00 households near the Ansan ICT in the construction site.”
However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to allow the victim to receive the right to operate the above apartment construction site restaurant.
This is the defendant.