(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.08.12 2020고단2873

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.08.12 2020고단2873

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:00 on May 3, 2020, the Defendant driven B Poter 2 while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.173% from the section of about 10km from the 10km to the 166-day nuclear road from the lusence of the lusence of the lusence of the lusence of the lusence of the lusence of the border.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is the person who is engaged in driving of the two cargo vehicles above B.

On May 3, 2020, the Defendant, at around 17:00, proceeded in the direction of a person, who is under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.173%, along the two-lanes, along the road of four-lanes in front of the wind distance of 166 o.e., Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si.

Since the location is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely by safely checking whether a vehicle in the signal atmosphere is in the front line with a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of the front week, and the back part of the DSS5 car driven by the victim C (Nam, 37 years old) who was in the front of the Defendant’s lane was the front part of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle, and the SSM5 car was pushed ahead in the future, and the victim E (Nam, 72 years old) who was in the front of the signal signal was driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, the victim G (ma, 9 years of age), and the victim H (n, 48 years of age) who took advantage of the said SM5 car due to the above occupational negligence, such as “contincing the pipe and tension in the part of the detailed and unknown information,” and at the same time, suffered injury to the victim E, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. On the defendant's legal statement C

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

-도로교통법

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2014.10.02 2014고단2980

-의정부지방법원 2020.10.19 2020고단2102

-대구지방법원 2014.03.06 2013고단1400

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.08.14 2013고단1175

-대구지방법원 2017.03.30 2017고단178