The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (five years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the principle of trial priority and the principle of directness on the market, has a unique area of sentencing in the first instance, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court on the grounds that there is no particular submission of new sentencing data in the trial of the lower court, and the sentencing grounds revealed in the course of the pleadings in the instant case (in particular, the Defendant, while drinking the victim P who died at a 0.166% alcohol concentration, she neglected his/her name while driving a narrow road in the speed of one lane, and caused a traffic accident. According to the accident video, the community bus entered the intersection at a slow speed where the damaged village was unlikely to be able to avoid the accident itself if it was not in the state of drinking, or not continuous, and even if the Defendant’s negligence was very serious, it cannot be said that the sentencing of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion in full view of all the reasons for sentencing revealed in the process of the instant argument.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.