The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of the same kind of punishment and has no record of exceeding the sentence. However, the crime of this case is not simply held by the defendant to administer phiphones, and is actively sold phiphones, and the quantity of phiphones (0.5175g) sold by the defendant is not small, and the defendant's age, character and character, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, means and consequence, etc., various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the following circumstances after the crime, and the scope of the sentencing guidelines for the crime of this case [Article 3 of the original judgment] recommended range of the sentencing guidelines for the crime of this case [this case (Article 1: 1.2.1 year imprisonment, 2.2 years imprisonment), basic area (Article 2.1-2) and (3) year imprisonment with prison labor, etc., 2.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.