1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. On July 19, 2014, the first instance court accepted only the claim for confirmation of invalidity of a resolution that appointed C as the chairperson of the defendant’s special meeting among the resolution adopted at the general meeting of the defendant on July 19, 2014, and rejected or dismissed the rest of the main claim and the conjunctive claim.

The plaintiff and the defendant appealed, but the defendant appealed on June 19, 2018, and thus, the appeal is limited to the remainder of the main claim and the conjunctive claim.

2. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, as they are, given that the reasoning for the judgment of the court of

(다만 2014. 7. 19.자 피고 임시총회 결의 중 C을 피고의 회장으로 선임한 결의의 무효확인 청구에 관한 부분은 제외). ◎ 제1심 판결 6쪽 5행부터 20행까지 및 6쪽 21행부터 7쪽 1행의 “설령 피고에 위와 같은 관례가 없어 J이 피고의 대표자가 아니었다고 한다면,”을 각 삭제한다.

◎ 제1심 판결 10쪽 3행의 “없으며, 오히려”를『없으며[관련 소송인 전주지방법원 2016나7213, 7626 판결(상고심 계속 중)에서는 J이 관례에 따라 선출된 피고의 대표자가 아니라고 보기도 하였다

[2] Even if the representative of the defendant elected according to J practice is the representative of the defendant, the representative shall be "....."

3. The decision of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's remaining main claim, and dismissed the conjunctive claim, is justifiable. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.