The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable as the sentence imposed by the defendant (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment below held that each of the crimes in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes for which the sentencing guidelines are set among the crimes in the judgment below refers to "light injury" as factors to reduce special sentencing factors (referring to injury whose treatment period is not more than two weeks and whose part of daily life does not cause serious harm, and whose treatment period does not require special medical treatment, such as feling operations, etc. for recovery. In this case, the victim did not reflect the victim's injury to the right-hand skes and salts requiring treatment for about two weeks (the above "light injury" is deemed to have suffered injury to the right-hand skes and salts requiring special treatment, and its scope of recommended punishment in accordance with the sentencing guidelines list of the above crimes is between six months of imprisonment and one year of imprisonment). However, considering the fact that the defendant repeatedly committed a crime in violation of the provision of alcohol or non-exclusive license even though he had the history of repeatedly being punished by imprisonment with prison labor, and even if he did not seem to have caused an unfair traffic accident during the trial without consideration of the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.