Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2016, the Defendant driven a Brocketing taxi at around 22:50, the Defendant continued to drive a two-lane two-lane road in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, from the station of oil stations to the 2-lane of the Gu, on a white day, and tried to change the course to the two-lane road to the 110-lane of the victim E (30 years old) driving in the same direction as before the Defendant, and then changed the course to the two-lane road to pass ahead, but the victim was unable to pass ahead by raising speed, while driving the central line to the port, driving the two-lane road in front of Gwangju, and driving the two-lane road to the right side of the above 2-lane off, the Defendant changed to the two-lane road to the two-lane road in front of the Defendant, and changed to the two-lane road to the two-lane repair, and then the above knee, e.g., the e., the above e., the e., the two-day off.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police accused;

1. Statement protocol to E by the police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the de facto survey report, a traffic accident site initial action report, a vehicle photograph, a diagnostic report, a estimate, a black stuff and CCTV image confirmation report, an agreement and a letter of application for the investigation, a video analysis by an agreement and a letter of application for the blocking of spirits, and a CD attachment investigation report (the Nos. 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, 19, 25, 26 of the evidence list);

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and his depth is divided.

The damage caused by the instant case is not severe, and the victim was agreed smoothly with the victim. However, the instant case is a dangerous crime that could lead to a large-scale accident as part of retaliation driving using the vehicle.

The defendant is also in the past.