The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of 3 years and 6 months) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable circumstances: (a) the Defendant made confessions of all the instant crimes and reflects on the fact that the nature of the instant crimes is extremely poor in light of the background and content of the instant crimes, the frequency of the instant crimes and the number of victims; (b) the injury was not recovered from the scene of the instant crimes and the victims did not agree with the victims; and (c) more than ten criminal punishment was imposed for the same type of fraud, and more than five times before and after the same theft was committed; (d) in particular, on December 22, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for three years for the same type of fraud in the Suwon Flag, which was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on December 22, 2011; and (e) the Defendant’s age, power, sex, home environment, conditions before and after the instant crimes were committed, and thus, the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 25(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, in the crime of the lower judgment (Article 25(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 25(1) of the Victim FK “A” is obvious that the Defendant’s appeal is a mistake, and thus, it is ex officio correction).