beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On March 31, 1931 (No. 2) and September 12, 1933 (No. 1), each registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the name of K on March 31, 193 and the name of K on September 12, 193 (No. 1); and
B. On May 26, 1995 with respect to land Nos. 1 and 2, the registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of Defendant 1 on the ground of donation on June 18, 1984 by the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (No. 4502).
C. The status of land Nos. 3 and 4 was unregistered, and registration of ownership preservation was completed on October 30, 1971 by M, N, andO sharing. D.
With respect to the land Nos. 3 and 4, on August 21, 2007, the registration of ownership transfer was made in the name of Defendant No. 2 from February 18, 1975 on the ground of sale under the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 7500).
E. M succeeded to L’s property upon the death of L to the south of L. The Plaintiffs, P, and Q inherited M’s property as M’s children died on December 3, 1987.
F. Meanwhile, the Defendant’s door filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiffs on September 12, 2013 against the Plaintiff regarding the registration of ownership transfer of 2400 square meters of Ro-gu, North Korea-si, Pohang-si, as the instant court 201Gahap1844, and received a favorable judgment on September 12, 2013.
The plaintiffs appealed against the judgment and the case is currently pending in the appellate court as the Daegu High Court 2013Na5207.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6 through 9 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 16 and 21, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiffs asserted that "each of the lands of this case is owned by plaintiffs, P, Q, etc. who inherited M, and since the defendant's door was donated land Nos. 1 and 2 of Jun. 18, 1984 or purchased land Nos. 3 and 4 of Feb. 18, 1975, it was based on a false certificate of guarantee and a false certificate of confirmation and completed each of the registrations of ownership transfer of this case, each of the above registrations is invalid.
Therefore, each of the lands of this case.