logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2015.10.06 2015고정39
청소년보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant (hereinafter referred to as “instant restaurant”) in the name of “C”.

Even a general restaurant business establishment licensed shall not operate a business where juveniles are engaged in the business of cooking and selling mainly alcoholic beverages.

Nevertheless, around February 16, 2015, the Defendant indicated that the Defendant employed the instant facts charged in the instant case from around February 16, 2015 to a business establishment banned from employing juveniles E, who are juveniles, from around February 18:30, 2015, but the instant restaurant is deemed to fall under a business establishment banned from employing juveniles by cooking and selling alcoholic beverages from around 21:30 to around February 21, 2015. However, as seen below, the instant restaurant is deemed to fall under a business establishment banned from employing juveniles, thereby

From 2:50 to 22:50 of the same day, juveniles E (n, 17 years of age) employed as daily employees in the restaurant of this case located in the Jeon Chang-gun, Jeon Chang-gun, and had them engage mainly in the work of receiving orders for alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages, and so on.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A business notification certificate;

1. A report on the control of amusement businesses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (related to working hours);

1. Article 58 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts and Articles 58 subparagraph 4 and 29 (1) of the Protection of Juveniles Eligible for the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. From February 16, 2015, from around 21:30 on February 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) from the restaurant in the instant case, he was aware of the secretariat of the JC Circuit; and (b) during that process, E became aware of customers.

However, E is not about 22:50 as stated in the facts charged, but about 22:00, and 2.00.

arrow