The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal: The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) unfairly unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized and reflected the instant crime.

It is not serious that police officers are injured by the defendant's crime.

On the other hand, the Defendant demanded that the victim police officer called out after receiving a report on a drinking driver suspected of driving alcohol reduces the drinking of the Defendant and let the Defendant get off the car. While the victim was taking a part of the open window of the driver's seat in order to prevent escape, the victim was rapidly changed to the left side, and the victim was shocked by a car, and the victim was led to the victim, and the victim was forced to go beyond the center, and the victim was deprived of the center, and the victim got out of the floor.

The defendant's crime was committed by very dangerous method, and in particular, since the place where the defendant had the victim go beyond the victim is the road where other vehicles pass, it was a place where there was considerable possibility of additional damage to the victim.

The defendant has been punished three times due to interference with the execution of official duties of the same criminal, and the criminal records due to non-licensed driving, drinking driving, and refusal to measure drinking have reached seven times, and a majority of them have been sentenced to a sentence, and the criminal records have been serving a sentence.

B. The instant crime committed by a child is a crime committed again during the period of repeated crime, which ends eight months after the execution of punishment was completed due to driving of alcohol, etc.

The accused has many criminal records such as violent crimes and other criminal records.

In full view of the above circumstances, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, as the new sentencing data that could change the sentencing was not submitted in the trial, the following factors are considered: the Defendant’s age, criminal records, sexual intercourse, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance after the crime, etc., as well as the sentencing guidelines for the Supreme Court’s sentencing committee.