The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On July 10, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s right right-hand bucks by using a lake that requires the victim E to pay 400,000 won for four (400,000 won) working in North-gu, North-gu, North-si, North-si, North-si, in the event that: (a) the victim E demands the victim E to pay for the said four (400,000 won; and (b) the victim’s face; and (c) the victim’s right-hand bucks.

B. At around 10:00 on August 7, 2017, the Defendant is required to make a telephone call to the victim E to a certain extent that “I am feasible feasia”;

The same rings, widths shall be no longer than one waste such as n;

v. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

E In telephone conversations with the victim H who is the mother of the E, “A special account for Domine,”

I/she shall do so for the same year, Hashedo, Hashea and Hashea, Hashea and die;

It is limited to the death of the same Doar, the same Doarian, and the F, all of which have been born during the same year.

Whether they are asked for their birth or not, or if they were threatened with any danger and injury.

2. Of the above facts charged, the charge of assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is an offense falling under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the express intent of the victim pursuant to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the victims expressed their intent not to be punished for the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted, so the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.