The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) tried to board a victim C (5) taxi on the front day of the “post office 17, 17,000,00,000,000 YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY 23:50 on September 1, 2016; (b) however, the said taxi passed by the Defendant and the victim thought that he would refuse to take the taxi; and (c) opened the steering door of the above taxi and boarded the cab, the victim was able to take the taxi from the taxi on one hand, and then the victim gets off the taxi so far as her body was pushed down and her left hand, and assaulted by the victim, etc.

2. The grounds for dismissing the public prosecution of this case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement of non-permanent sources of punishment bound in the public trial records, it can be acknowledged that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on April 10, 2017. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.