A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2015, around 00:50, at the defendant's house, 112 Dong 1604, and 112 Dong 1604, the defendant, while drinking alcohol together with his spouse C and her wife D, C, who "I am why she will work in his/her own, and her mind that she was fright to her own in the above residence, and she was frighted to C, while drinking alcohol together with his/her spouse C and her wife D.

Therefore, the defendant tried to attach a fire to the floor of the living room with a bar with approximately 500 square meters in transit, which has been kept in the house beer, and the passage through the house with a dog with a bar with a light of about 500 square meters in transit.

However, C and D did not put a fire by removing the Defendant from his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant was prepared for the purpose of preventing a fire to a building in which people exist.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Details of report on 112 cases;

1. On-site photographs of the case;

1. Application of seizure records and list statutes;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. As for the reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant committed a crime that leads to the failure of many people to commit the crime, and the Defendant’s crime cannot be deemed to be light in light of its risk.

However, it appears that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, while having been under mental pressure by having the defendant married with his/her father while his/her income has been reduced, etc., he/she appears to be a contingent crime; the defendant has led the defendant from the prosecutor's office to commit a crime; and the defendant has shown his/her mistake in his/her name during the trial; and the defendant's spouse stated that "the defendant has no record of criminal punishment once with his/her father" and that he/she would take the front place.