logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.06.26 2013고합100
뇌물수수
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months and by a fine of twenty-five thousand won.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Until the end of March 2012, the Defendant served as the team leader at the Institute C and served as the head of the E headquarters from July 2012 to July 2012, and took charge of controlling and controlling the distribution of pseudo petroleum.

Between January 2012 and February 2012, the Defendant received alcohol and entertainment from “K” located in “G” hotel near the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul F Station as a hub for mediating the leakage of control information on pseudo petroleum at the “H” hotel located in “G” hotel near the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and received alcohol and entertainment from “K located in the Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, which is going to open, and received cash KRW 10 million for the purpose of providing control information.

On March 2012, the Defendant received alcohol and entertainment from the above I in the studio lum of “O” in front of the Ma Hospital in Songpa-gu Seoul, and received cash KRW 15 million again under the pretext of a honorarium for the fact that he actually known the control information of the above K.

Accordingly, the defendant received a bribe of KRW 25 million in total on two occasions in relation to the duties of officers and employees of the Institute which is deemed public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made by each prosecutor of the suspect examination protocol of P and I by the prosecution;

1. Each entry in an investigation report (Report confirming the details of K enforcement), an investigation report (report attached to the rules on the quality inspection of petroleum products), an investigation report (related to the duties of executives and employees of the Institute), an investigation report (report attached to the organization of the Institute), an investigation report (verification of issuance from the personnel management of the Institute on March 26, 2012 to Defendant D head of the Institute), an investigation report (the result of an analysis of six telephone calls of call brokerage broks, such as I), an investigation report (the result of an analysis of six telephone calls of call brokerage brokers, etc.), and an investigation report (report attached to an extract

1. To report the results of analysis of personnel record cards (defendants), telephone details analysis maps, and the results of analysis of the secondary telephone details;

arrow