logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.09.11 2018가합402020
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff loaned money to the Defendants as indicated in paragraphs (a) through (d) below. As such, Defendant B was jointly and severally liable with Defendant B to pay KRW 698.1 million in total as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d) and KRW 120.1 million in total, Defendant C was jointly and severally liable with Defendant B, and Defendant C is jointly and severally liable with Defendant B to pay KRW 42 million in each of the following items: (a) Defendant B purchased the said land’s “E” operated by it and the G G-171m2 (hereinafter “parking site”) in the area adjacent to the access road of “F” operated by the Plaintiff, and lent the purchase price of the said land to the Defendant B in such a way that the Plaintiff directly sold the said land to the Defendant by paying KRW 15.6 million in total.

B) Defendant B loaned KRW 120,000,000 to Defendant D in cash on the ground that he won won was derived from the apartment subscription under Defendant D’s name, and that he lent the said money to Defendant D, and Defendant B paid the purchase price to Defendant D with the said money. C) Defendant B loaned the first intermediate payment of KRW 42,00,000 to Defendant C’s account, and the Plaintiff deposited KRW 42,00,000 to Defendant C account and lent the said money. D) Defendant B lent the remainder of the apartment purchase price and the operating funds of “E” to Defendant B operated by Defendant B, which was the remainder of the apartment purchase price and the amount to be paid by the Plaintiff from H to directly transfer money to Defendant B. The Defendants’ assertion asserted by the Defendants is that the Plaintiff’s father, who was not the Plaintiff, donated the Plaintiff’s father to Defendant B or used directly.

The Plaintiff, I, and Defendant B had continued to engage in money transactions, and Defendant B also lent money to the Plaintiff and I.

arrow