(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.09 2013고단8625

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.04.09 2013고단8625

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Grandland Kapool.

On October 14, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:20 on October 14, 2013, and led to the driving of the three-lane in front of the Jeonpo District Public Security Center located in the Jeonpo-dong, Busan, Busan, to the intersection.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, the person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who gets on a road by reducing speed and by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive motor vehicles in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, even if the vehicle signal has been changed to the stop signal, the Defendant neglected this, and due to the negligence of proceeding with the vehicle signal, received the victim D (ma, 13 years old) who opened the crosswalk from the left side to the right side of the vehicle in front of the driver's seat.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a ductal of ductal aggregate, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentence like the order shall be sentenced in consideration of the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the fact that the vehicle in this case is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the defendant is against the defendant.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

참조조문

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2014.01.21 2013고정5693

-부산지방법원 2020.05.20 2020고단998

-부산지방법원 2014.08.18 2014고단4152

-부산지방법원 2013.10.02 2013고단2553

-부산지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고단8529