The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Determination of the grounds for appeal in this case is against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime; the vehicle driven by the Defendant is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance; and the victim agreed with the victim of a traffic accident, and the victim wanted to have the Defendant’s prior seat, etc. are considered in favor of the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is an escape without taking necessary measures because it causes a traffic accident while driving with drinking alcohol by the defendant, resulting in the injury to the victim or the dacting of drunk driving even after destroying the vehicle, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good. The degree of damage to the victim and the damaged vehicle is not minor, and the defendant's negligence as to the occurrence of the traffic accident of this case, such as character and behavior, family relation, the background and motive of the crime, the circumstances at the time of the crime, and the subsequent circumstances, are considered in consideration of various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as character and behavior of the defendant, family relation, the circumstances of the crime, and the following circumstances, even if considering other circumstances alleged by the defendant, the punishment of the court below (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 80 hours of social service, 40 hours of compliance driving instruction) is too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.