All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the Defendants in summary of the grounds for appeal (four years for each Defendant’s imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. According to the defendants' statements at the trial court, the defendants conspired with each other to commit the crime of this case and there are circumstances that can be considered in the circumstances of the defendants, such as the fact that all the defendants recognized the crime of this case, the number of theft crimes committed by the defendants was limited to three times, the stolen property was very wide, and the defendants' statements at the trial court, the defendants conspired to commit the crimes, entered most of the apartment buildings of the victims, and sold stolen property was distributed equally. The defendant A seems not to have led to the unilaterally, and the defendant A voluntarily surrenders to some larceny crimes, and the victim F, K was agreed with, and partially deposited money for the victim G and I.

However, the crime of this case, on the other hand, was committed by the Defendants by intrusioning upon the apartment locking devices of the victims three times, and stolen or attempted property. The crimes of this case were embezzled using gambling funds, etc. while being kept approximately KRW 11,469,00,00 in total as Defendant B’s age club operating business. The crimes of this case were committed several times of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and the Defendants committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that they had been punished several times of punishment. The statutory punishment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) among the crimes of this case is imprisonment with prison labor for life or for not less than six years. The four years of imprisonment with prison labor imposed on the Defendants is near the lower sentence of the punishment imposed by a limited term of punishment, taking account of the records, such as the Defendants’ age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, method and result of the crime, etc.