The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 2, 2015, in the “I” restaurant that he operated in Gwangju Mine-gu H, Gwangju; (b) purchased ships and was preparing to transport them, there is the amount of KRW 1 billion and the amount of money to be received from the Defendant J.

Recognizing that 1.6 billion won can be awarded a successful bid for a cargo ship from auction, she seems to have been able to invest in the victim as if she had been re-able.

1. On August 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s attitude that “I” was “in the coffee shop of the Party near the Defendant, at the same time, to request the victim to make an investment of KRW 1.6 billion with the interest rate on the money to be invested late; and (b) expressed the victim’s view that the Defendant would invest KRW 1.6 billion with the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any money, and even if he did not receive money from the injured party due to the lack of certain income, he could not invest 1.6 billion won.

On August 13, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the damaged party to the account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 4, 2015, the Defendant, at the above “I” restaurant, sent phone calls to the victim and sent money to a creditor bank PB fund, and the Defendant appeared to have been able to terminate the current termination, with the purport that “only 30 days would have been used and repaid if he/she first borrowed money.”

However, the Defendant did not pay money to the fund, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to no special property or income, the Defendant could not make a short-term change.

On September 4, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the damaged party to the account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the questioning of the accused and the statement of theJ);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of Tong 1.