logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.08.11 2019고정1075
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, they shall be prohibited.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are employees of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-building (StateF) and victims G enter into the management entrustment agreement with the Government on March 21, 2018 and manage the facilities of the above building.

On September 11, 2018, even though F notified the victim of the termination of the management service contract, the Defendants continued to possess and use the above building H, and the Defendants conspired to intrude into the office to produce the victim by force at the above office.

On September 20, 2018, at around 16:50 on September 20, 2018, the Defendants conspired with the above Defendants to put the above office door in the above E E E and “Seo-gu,” and I, a manager, entered the cre in order to verify the identity of the Defendants.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded on the room managed by the victim against the victim’s will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B and C’s statement in the court of law (a statement to the effect that any of the Does managed by the office on the day of the instant case opened a door outside the door with the knowledge of “special and distinct strawing” outside the door, and four male and female persons entered the office)

1. The statement of the police officer's statement about Defendant C (a statement to the effect that Defendant A, Defendant D, and Defendant C entered the instant office together, a statement to the effect that Defendant C continued to leave the instant office, and that Defendant C continued to leave the office of this case, and that Defendant C was called D with a drone to remove the door when I demanded the Defendants to leave the office of this case)

1. The statement of the police officer with J (a statement to the effect that there was Defendant A, Defendant D, Defendant C, and Defendant B at the time of arrival of the office of this case, and that later K entered)

1. Two staff members employed by G in the police statement against Defendant A continue to reach the Defendants.

arrow