beta
Text
1. The part (A) on the ship that connects each point of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 27, 26, and 1 among the area of 130 square meters per Sim2 before Gunsan-si.
Reasons
1. Co-owned property partition claim
A. 1) The fact of recognition is 1) the area of 130 square meters and the area of 1702 square meters and the area of 1702 square meters in Si, Gun, M. (hereinafter “instant
(2) On July 27, 1991, P, its heir on July 24, 2001, completed the registration of ownership transfer as a result of inheritance on January 2, 1998, respectively, in the shares of 21/133, Defendant C, J, K, K, L, and D, respectively. (2) On the other hand, Q, who was another co-inheritors of the network, died on October 27, 1991, succeeded to the shares of 7/133, respectively, by Defendant E and F, its heir, and R inherited the shares of 6/133, Defendant G, its heir, Defendant H, and I inherited the shares of 4/133.
3) On May 25, 2017, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale by compulsory auction on May 18, 2017 with respect to the aggregate of 56/13 shares of Defendant B, J, K, and L among the instant real estate. (4) Defendant D renounced his inheritance to the networkO, and his inheritance shares were inherited to P and Defendant C, B, G, H, I, E, H, H, H, H, H, H, K, K, K, and L as stated in the attached Form “the cause of claim changed.” Meanwhile, P’s inheritance shares were inherited to Defendant C, B, D, H, H, H, I, I, I, I, and E, and F, and eventually, each of the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ share was inherited to Plaintiff 56/13/13, Defendant C, C, C, H, H, H, 13, 138/136/67, 1375/79/75, 197, and 375/7.
5) No agreement was reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on the method of dividing the land of this case until the date of closing the argument of this case. [Grounds for recognition] There was no dispute, and Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers)
B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff, a co-owner of the land of this case, may request the Defendants, who are other co-owners, to divide the land of this case.
2. If the co-owners fail to reach an agreement on the division of co-owned property in the method of partition of co-owned property, and thus the co-owners are divided by judgment.