The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasons for appeal are as follows: (a) the business of dispatching cleaning workers from Korea to Japan in connection with the closed city cleaning business due to the use of the summary of the reasons for appeal by Japan was insufficient to be successful since it was difficult to conduct the business so long as the problems of the workers in Japan are not resolved; and (b) there was no contract between the cleaning business and the Japanese cleaning business; and (c) the Defendants used the money that the complainant received from the complainant as entertainment expenses.

Inasmuch as the Defendants did not present any basis as to the use of a certain person as entertainment expenses for the progress of the above business, the Defendants deceiving the complainant.

must be viewed.

Nevertheless, the lower court rejected the credibility of the victim’s statement without reasonable grounds, and found the Defendants not guilty of the facts charged in this case on the sole basis of the Defendants’ assertion.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s duly admitted and investigated evidence, the lower court determined that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was insufficient to find the Defendants guilty of the charges.

1) On September 15, 2014, the complainant filed a complaint only against the Defendant A, and around December 2, 2014, both Defendant A and Defendant B filed a complaint. The second accusation, unlike the facts charged in the instant case, runs the business of supplying CCTV to Mexico and the city in Ecuador.

It stated that the money of this case was borrowed by fraud and acquired by fraud.

2) In the prosecution, among the above facts of the accusation, the defendants would be better than the amount of the workplace wages where the complainant was previously enrolled on November 2013.

The complainant shall be urged from November 30, 2013 to May 2014.